Why is SHORTBUS necessary? Stick figures don't cut it anymore!

F6 recieved the title of this post and the pic on the right as a confidential comment towards this whole fiasco, we thought it was funny and posted it. In addition, so F6 can provide a full disclosure in its public service, here is the original WANE TV News Channel Fifteen story by Megan Stembol. Please note that there were certain inaccuracies in this report which were later corrected by Kevin Leininger in his review of the situation which you can review in the post below.


And finally, a comment from John Cameron Mitchell, taken directly from Andy Towle's Towleroad, the 22nd of March 2006:

"I actually like pornography, but I don't consider this film pornographic. I define — and most people do — pornography as devoid of artistic intent. The purpose of pornography is to arouse. I don't think anyone got [sexually aroused] watching this film. There is a certain provocation we had in mind with this film, but more important than that, we wanted to use sex as a metaphor for things that were, perhaps, universal, themes like connection and love and fear. We just thought the language of sex could be used the way the language of music could be used in a musical."

SHORTBUS creates local controversy at Public Library

John Cameron Mitchell's film SHORTBUS which introduced the world to the music and acting of Jay Brannan has come under the guise of certain puritan idealist locally. According to a WANE TV report, local activist Mike Hinkle is on a mission of ignorance and mortification, based on his perception of normal everyday American SEX! Yes you read correctly, a movie that discusses that horrible topic about what we do to each other willingly, yet refuse to talk about; while we wonder why our kids our having kids and worse yet getting incurable diseases, because no one is willing to have an honest conversation about relationships, let alone sex! SHORTBUS and the actors who starred in it had that as its primary goal a discussion and presentation about RELATIONSHIPS AND SEX!!

Now apparently he has rented SHORTBUS along with several other movies he deems unworthy of public comment and review to be taken to the Associated Churches of Fort Wayne. To start a censorship battle with the Library Board there? Who knows.

"Hinkle is now (supposedly) filing a formal complaint with the library, to have the movie banned from the library shelves. Hinkle says a library committee reviews complaints about material, and then decides whether or not to take action." A move Justin Roebuck, another long time patron of the library, agrees with sort of. "That gentleman has every right to file a complaint, but I think it's up to individual discretion to decide what is, and is not pornography." Justin further defended the film, "It is about sex in modern day America. I think it was an important film, actually."

F6 wants to take a moment, roll over and give Justin four paws in the air, for standing up for truth and freedom of speech in the midst of this obvious act of bigoted close minded grandstanding on the part of Mike Hinkle.

Library Director Jeff Krull reassured citizens that when patrons check out those kinds of magazines, they have to leave behind their driver's license for collateral. When it comes to checking out movies, Krull says the staff strictly enforces the G-, PG-, and R-rating system. A further clarification of the system states that unrated movies which include certain foreign language films and television shows also are unrated and therefore have restricted access.

In a letter dated the eleventh of January 2008, Jeff explains the Resource Development Policy to a concerned female patron, "materials in the collection present all points of view on the current and historical issues and inclusive portrayals of human experience in a wide variety of media and styles." Jeff goes on in the letter to express one of the most Libertarian stances I have ever heard in my lifetime: "It is not the ACPL policy not to place any... restrictions on borrowers in making ... selections. We rely on parents (as the primary educators of their children) to provide guidance and direction to their children on appropriate reading choices. We believe it is the right and responsibility of parents, and only parents, to restrict their own children's access to library materials they believe are unsuitable."

The letter was made available by Dan Turkette of Fort Wayne News here in (pdf) his coverage of this story. Which brings me to my last notation: I am actually the one who made the formal request for this movie to be purchased, so I could review it on here as part of F6's service to the community and broaden everyone's queer horizons a little more each day, since they couldn't retrieve it from another library. Six month turn around is actually fast work on their part which results in a excellent government efficiency rating for processing a casual request! Thank you to WANE TV, Dan, and Mike for bringing this to my attention so promptly.

Now all I have to do is pray that Mike or the Associated Churches decide to return the DVD to the Library rather than burning it in effigy. To refuse to allow the rest of the citizenry make an open and honest decision for themselves about this offering to the public conversations surrounding RELATIONSHIPS and SEXUALITY would be the greatest offense to the Constitution hands down! If it is not returned, I would hope that the ACPL would restrict if not ban this zealot from checking out further material at a minimum and preferably they would sue his ass in federal court for theft or destruction of public property and violation of our first amendment rights to preview information that is already in the public sphere.

[Editor's Note: Text in orange was highlighted after posting, reflecting
where it was quoted without direct cite by The News Sentinel.]



[F6 UPDATED:] In his Opening Arguments, Leo Morris, reminds us that in fact the correct legal question regarding Community Standards is whether SHORTBUS is obscene not pornographic and that review falls under the jurisdiction of the County Prosecutor who will probably not touch this issue with a twenty foot pole and defer to the standing policy of the Library's review process for guidance.

[THIS IS A POLITICAL RANT:] Although with that information now out on the blogosphere, we are only three steps away from a concerned member of the Associated Churches or the Library Board to resign from a statewide watchdog organization which then turns around and files a formal complaint even after the local government authority clears the movie from any violation of community standards or obscenity, to get the ball rolling yet again. I wonder who the Special Prosecutor will be for this one. Can you imagine the headline "City of Churches sues Independent Film".

It is We The People not I The Citizen at the beginning of the Constitution!

Come on people this whole fiasco is a flagrant violation of the intent behind our first amendment rights and my liberty to decide what is appropriate for myself and my children to read or view. This isn't about porn it is about an honest visual conversation that apparently some in the community don't want to have undertaken, and that my friends, is puritanical censorship not to mention minority rules trumping majority rights.

subsidies? we dont need no fucking subsidies!

MAY I HAVE THE ATTENTION OF CONSERVATIVES, COMMUNISTS, LIBERALS, AND SOCIALIST PLEASE:

This is just one more example of what happens when the market is allowed to regulate itself on prices or services ~ competition always provides a win for the consumer and for the businesses. Now the only three questions I have to ask you all to consider are:

1. How many people from the north and east side of town drove all the
way to Roanoke to get cheaper fuel for their Sports Utility Vehicle?
2. Would not that of course be a bad thing by wasting all that gas while taking
advantage of corporate greed to increase business revenue and statistics?
3. How much money did the Federal, State, and Local government
agencies loose in tax revenue based on the reduced versus normal pricing?

Gas Price War in Roanoke

(Roanoke, Ind. - WANE TV) We all keep an eye on gas prices, hoping to fill up for less. Now, two local gas stations are offering dramatically lower prices than others.

When you drive around Fort Wayne, you'll see gas prices at several local stations inching close to $3.00 a gallon for regular unleaded. "I wish it would go down," said one customer filling up. "I remember it only took 20 bucks or so, but now you put in about 40 to fill up," said another. "It's way too high," said another customer.

Just 20 miles away from the Summit City, in Roanoke, it's a dramatically different story. Gas prices there are nearly 30 cents cheaper, and that's making many people very happy."I was like yeah; that's a deal right there," said one excited Roanoke customer who filled up in Roanoke for $2.68. "I was really happy when I saw it," said another customer. "I think it all ought to be 2.68," said another. The prices are cheaper at the two Roanoke stations, mainly because, of competition.

"Lassus Handy Dandy has come to the Roanoke community some 20 years ago, and found ourselves with some new competition in the area," Lassus Handy Dandy Manager Andrew Carmichael told Newschannel 15's Matt McCutcheon. That competition comes from the recently-opened Sparky Mart, right across the street.
"We felt that we should be even with them on price, so that's where the price ended up at 2.68... before they stopped and let us be even," said Sparky Mart General Manager Scott Olbin.

Analysts point to higher gas prices as taking a toll on the economy; that's something local people agree with. "It's going to curt-tail my traveling this summer," said one concerned customer. "I tend to have to try to watch what I spend when going out, and on food," said another. "It's killing me! Simply killing-me," said another. While some people call $2.68 a bargain... "Every penny counts," said one customer. ...it's a price that'll won't likely last for long.

"They vary everyday, so you never know if it's going to go down or up tomorrow," said Olbin.

!VOTE LIBERTARIAN FOR A TRUE CHANGE!